2021-01-12 10:01:56 作者： 所属分类：新闻中心 阅读：0 评论：0

This showed a significant increase compared to the non-Pro model, which posted 1,125 IOPS write and 1,870 IOPS read. I will replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now. They just seem overwhelmed in Customer Service. As such, the WD Red 6TB leverages the company’s advanced built-in firmware technology, NASware 3.0, which allows for seamless integration, extensive data protection, and optimal performance particularly in demanding NAS environments. Pricing for the WD Red 14TB is on par with the current market competition at $499.99. All rights reserved. Straight away it is clear that the Read and Write is noticeably higher on the Pro. I could understand (1) bad drive as bad luck, but (2) is unacceptable. Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations, Select the department you want to search in, Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2017. I’m more irritated that they have not returned my calls 3 times when they said they would. We have already looked at the performance of the WD Red, and it now time for us to take the WD Red Pro for a … Our synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the way the drive performs during a thorough preconditioning phase. Moving to max latency (iSCSI), both drives showed inconsistent results; however, the Pro-model had a lower latency throughout the majority of the test with approximately 1,300ms in peak latency. WD supplied StorageReview with 8 samples of their new HDDs, which we configured in RAID10 in our Synology DiskStation DS1815+. If you can afford them the WD Red Pro drives are excellent. The results from our evaluation of the WD Red Pro 6 TB is presented in this review. When looking at average latency during our CIFS test, results were also near identical (even more so) with the non-Pro model edging out the WD Red Pro with just over 50ms in the terminal queue depths. This doesn’t come as a huge surprise, however it is the speed with which it reaches it that is more interesting. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro NAS Hard Drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. Everything about them makes them a perfect drive. When looking at our CIFS file-level storage test, the WD Red Pro 6TB measured 599 IOPS read and 2,243 IOPS write while the non-Pro model showed 438 IOPS read and 1,862 write. The WD Red 6TB drive posted … After much trouble shooting with Synology (these drives are on the Synology approved hdd list), Western Digital and my IT department, it appears both drives came with too many bad sectors to function. In this post, MiniTool Partition Wizard shows you Seagate IronWolf vs WD Red specifications and lists some factors you should take into consideration when purchasing a NAS drive. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. Please make sure that you are posting in the form of a question. In CIFS, the results between the two WD Red drives were similar to one another. When looking at large-block sequential performance in iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model had top read activity at 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s of the non-Pro model, which was an impressive 139% increase. It features the Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and SanDisk TLC NAND. Was bought for use in a Synology DS916+. Good performance and designed to run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments. It’s one thing the disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me give this product a low score. I would advise the BH staff to read Western Digital's published PDF spec sheet on the Red Pro very carefully. By the end, the WD Pro had the better performance with just under 438ms in latency (compared to the non-Pro’s ~480ms). WD Red Pro for Big Business If you’re looking for maximum performance in a heavy use NAS, WD Red Pro delivers the same exceptional performance for the business customer. Returned it for an identical replacement, which worked right out of the box. WD Red SA500 1TB Overview. WD Red 2TB Single drive: 86 2x WD Red 2TB RAID 0 (Striped): 87 2x WD Red 2TB RAID 1 (Mirror): 88. In our first test measuring 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro 6TB iSCSI boasted speeds of 1,541 IOPS write and 2,602 IOPS read. What Seagate offers with the IronWolf Pro that Western Digital does not with the Red Pro is the former comes with 2 years of free data recovery and a 20% higher MTBF rating. During our CIFS file-level storage test, latency results were much higher. The drive had 78 failing sectors and was still under warranty. These are brand new drives with manufacture dates in May 2018. In write latency, however, the WD Red showed the best results with 1,677.8ms. But I tried testing the drives nonetheless. This is a SATA drive from WD targeting the NAS market. Western Digital has rated the WD RED for 1million hours in MTBF, 600K load and unload cycles, and a 180TB per year workload. Might be a great product but packaging destroyed it, Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2020. I bought (2) of these units to use in my Synology DiskStation 718+. Their default is 120 days, seriously, so if you do buy this and have to return it, be diligent! Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 512 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD141KFGX. When choosing a NAS drive, some people may not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red. WD has the Red Pro listed as <10 in 10^15, not <1 in 10^15. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. Western Digital Red Pro NAS Hard Drive Performance. The drives had clearly been jumbled around a lot as the anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings from the drives hitting each other. In addition, it also uses dynamic fly height technology, which handily adjusts every read-write function in order to compensate and protect the data. StorageReview.com is a world leading independent storage authority, providing in-depth news coverage, detailed reviews, SMB/SME consulting and lab services on storage arrays, hard drives, SSDs, and the related hardware and software that makes these storage solutions work. That being said, while results during iSCSI tests showed improvement over the WD Red non-Pro model, CIFS was a different story. Although the NAS we are using (the Synology DS916+ is a 4-Bay NAS ), using two hard drives does limit which RAID types that we can use. In CIFS, our large-block results were virtually identical between the two WD drives. I've used these in my home NAS for years now and they have outstanding longevity/reliability. Preconditioning and Primary Steady State Tests: Our Enterprise Synthetic Workload Analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks. We are including Synology SHR, JBOD, and RAID 0 data sets. The WD Red Pro also has a higher potential cache than the IronWolf Pro… In addition, the Red Pro drives feature NASware version 3.0, WD’s hard drive firmware designed specifically for NAS solutions. For NAS environments with 8 to 16 bays, WD Red Pro is designed to handle an increase in workload and comes with a 5-year limited warranty. Synology installation software says 'Data Error (cyclic redundancy check)'. For our review, we only had two WD Red Pro 10TB hard drives available. And the long 5 year warranty is great and WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy to do. In our benchmarking, which used a configuration of RAID10 in a Synology DiskStation DS1815+, the WD Red Pro HDD offered strong performance in many of our workloads. Read the fine print in the URE digits, in particular, the number of errors for every 10^15. The WD Red 6TB showed average reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively. The average 8k random read speed of the WD Red Pro is 162 IOPS at QD256; the WD SE is slightly behind with 155 IOPS, the WD Red offers 135 IOPS, and … Drive was recognized by the NAS but it couldn't initialize it. The WD 6TB Red Pro is aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices. AFTER NOTE: Finally, resolution...It took several (at least 5) interactions with Customer Service, none of which were possible by phone, but the issue is finally resolved. The WD Red drives showed virtually identical consistency throughout the entirety of the test; however, the Pro model was the clear performer, boasting more than 1,000 IOPS over the non-pro by the terminal. Subscribe to the StorageReview newsletter to stay up to date on the latest news and reviews. I did everything they told me to to get a replacement. The WD Pro model posted 362.69ms read and 135.75ms write while the non-Pro drive had a significantly slower 755.84ms read and a 158.81ms write. The Red Pro family is designed to address the needs of those using storage systems up to 16 bays, ideal for SMBs and remote/branch offices that rely on NAS storage. Designed specifically with medium or large scale business customers in mind, WD Red™ Pro drives are available for up to 24-bay NAS systems. There's a problem loading this menu right now. Should you buy standard or Pro Drives for your NAS - is it worth the money? Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2020, Have ordered many WD drives over the years. Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2018. I thought I would try to start switching to the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives. The WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read functions in our CIFS test, which outpaced the non-Pro version by over 1,000ms. The WD Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read and 40,341 IOPS write while the WD Red showed 51,147 read and 44,441 IOPS write. (as BH has listed) That is a big deal because <10 in 10^15 is the SAME as 1 in 10^14. @nvidia Quadro RTX 8000 from our recent @zbyhp rev. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). Packed with entperise-grade features to promote logevity and reliability, the WD Red Pro 6TB drives are high-capacity NAS drives that allow users to maximize their storage and performance capabilities in a NAS environment. WD Red Pro 10TB NAS Hard Disk Drive - 7200 RPM Class SATA 6Gb/s 256MB Cache 3.5 Inch - WD102KFBX (99) Write a Review In CIFS, results were also fairly inconsistent across the board; though the performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between the two drives. These profiles have been developed to make it easier to compare to our past benchmarks as well as widely-published values such as max 4k read and write speed and 8k 70/30, which is commonly used for enterprise drives. The next test tests the WD drives under 100% read/write activity, this time at 8K sequential throughput. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. So I bought some of these drives. Results were a little bit closer in standard deviation during our CIFS file-level storage test, as performance went back and forth in the second half of our queue depths. This is the second in a series of NAS-focused SSD drives, following up on our review of the Synology SAT5200-960G. We promise no spam! Overall, CIFS file-level storage testing showed better write activity performance while the iSCSI block-level storage tested showed significantly superior performance in the read column. WD Red Pro WD6003FFBX 6TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review They arrived in a big box without any packaging inside - just the anti-static bags. Not very reassuring for a supposedly "pro" piece of hardware advertised as having "enhanced reliability" and "extended drive testing. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. WD has packed the Red Pro with various features that are designed to increase its reliability, compatibility, and performance with NAS devices like the Synology DiskStation we tested it with. Even packaged it in the original packaging. Top subscription boxes – right to your door. Western Digital's WD Red SA500 is a solid-state-disk optimized for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary storage. Alongside the launch of the larger 6TB capacity Red HDDs with NASware 3.0, WD also launched a new family of NAS drives dubbed Red Pro. Furthermore, for $550 at press time, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at $440. Here, the WD Red had better results; sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max latency. Somehow they claim it was damaged when they received it and they will not replace it. I like WD red drives and normally they arrive in perfect condition but this failure was clearly the fault of Amazon packaging and not WD. I'm returning it in hopes for a replacement that works. Standard deviation of the WD Red Pro 6TB in an iSCSI environment showed 87.645ms read and 127.90ms write to demonstrate its consistency. In addition, 7200 RPM Red Pro models with 2 - 4 TB capacities were also introduced. This one (12TB Red Pro) is the first that was DOA. I would never use a 10 14 drive like the WD Red in a NAS. This was a great improvement on the non-Pro model, which measured 279.93ms write and 103.49ms read. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. For average latency, the WD Red Pro posted WD Red Pro 6TB 98.35ms read and 166.10ms write during the iSCSI block-level test. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s, while the Pro version posted 308MB/s write. Our next test shifts focus from a pure 4K random read or write scenario to a mixed 8K 70/30 workload where we will show how performance scales in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q. It undercuts the IronWolf Pro 10TB and WD Red Pro 10TB by around 20-25%. Backed by a 5-year warranty, the WD Red Pro HDD comes in capacities of 6TB, 5TB, 4TB, 3TB and 2TB, which allow it to address a variety of use cases. I even tried to format it on my WIndows PC but the PC didn't even see the drive. The 6TB Red Pro builds on WD’s portfolio of purpose-built hard drives for NAS, offering a 50% capacity boost over the previous highest capacity model (4TB WD Red Pro). It would spin but not initialize. Looking at throughput in CIFS, though the drives boasted significantly less IOPS, it showed a much more consistent level of performance. Most importantly, it costs significantly less, just around 15 cents per gigabyte compared to some 25 cents of the Seagate. Our last test looks at large-block sequential performance. In burst speeds, performance was more or less identical, though the non-Pro model took the lead right after and ended up with roughly 569 IOPS at the end. Our emphasis is on storage solutions for the midmarket and enterprise, with limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2018. The WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital’s formidable contender to Seagate’s IronWolf 110. Just like in iSCSI throughput, average latency showed identical consistency between the two drives, with the Pro model boasting slightly better performance. Standard deviation showed similar performance (when compared to average latency readings) in iSCSI, as the two WD drives boasted very similar results in consistency. Some of the other reliability features designed to protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events. Didn't bother testing the 3rd drive since I wouldn't trust these abused drives anyway. With a price of $140 for 1 TB, the SSD is priced more aggressively than Seagate's IronWolf 110 NAS competitor, yet offers similar performance and still retains the five-year warranty. In iSCSI, the WD Pro boasted its top read performance of 28,110 IOPS; however, its write speeds were significantly lower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 24,439 IOPS write (vs. the Pros 13,713 IOPS). This put the drive at … I was instructed by Western Digital to return the drives to the seller. Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2020. The new NAS-centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in my testing. I'll update my review appropriately. We compared the WD Red SA500 against a few other mainstream SSDs. WD Red Pro WD4003FFBX 4TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review Maybe their warehouse workers need a bit of a break, that would understandable to me so I returned the drives for a refund and I'll be much more cautious when ordering any hard drives from Amazon in the future. Internally the Red range of drives use 1TB platters, Marvell … In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro model showed almost 8,700ms. I've got a lot of 6TB WD Red drives deployed and working fine. I bought four of these (quadruplets) for my four disk NAS unit. Copyright © 1998-2020 Flying Pig Ventures, LLC Cincinnati, Ohio. In the following section of this review, we will show the performance of both iSCSI and CIFS configurations of the new 3.5″ WD Red Pro 6TB HDDs. ", Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive, Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019, +1 - Item arrived on time, and not damaged, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2018, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2020. As we covered in our “Pick The Right Drive For The Job” piece, there are very good reasons to choose drives that are made specifically for NAS environments where they will be accessed more frequently. Pics from our @hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review! The correct choice of hard drives for a NAS system is influenced by a … Windows is unable to initialize the drives in order to delete unallocated dive space, and the Western Digital Data LifeGuard Diagnostics fail to test the drives, 'Too many bad sectors detected.' In iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model was the clear winner in read activity with 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s. Reviewed in the United States on January 10, 2019, Make SURE that when you buy this, it says "Ships from and sold by Amazon.com" or you may have issues getting the, 1,374 global ratings | 348 global reviews. Lyle is a staff writer for StorageReview, covering a broad set of end user and enterprise IT topics. Disabling it will result in some disabled or missing features. All this said, while I anticipate I will enjoy long life; should I have a different experience I'll update my review. Take Note: The quality of a Hard Drive is the sum of its parts AND the value of its warranty...My drive dead after 33 days. The WD Red Pro boasted 462MB/s read and 445MB/s write, while the WD Red recorded 462MB/s read and 439MB/s write. Western Digital entered this area in July of last year, pushing their popular Green and Red lines up to 6TB. WD Red Pro Review (4TB, NASware 3.0) by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. written by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. We’d mention other brands, but at this time only Western Digital and Seagate make drives of this capacity. WD Red Pro (or Seagate IronWolf). In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s (the Pro version posted 308MB/s write). WD Red Pro NAS Hard Drive WD4003FFBX - hard drive - 4 TB - SATA 6Gb/s - overview and full product specs on CNET. After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in. You can still see all customer reviews for the product. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). These include a 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and a five year warranty. We will compare it to the WD Red 6TB (non-Pro) model from the WD line. It took additional attempts for acknowledgement of my return of the bad drive shipment back to them, which then finally activated the full 5 year warranty on the replacement drive. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. 5.0 out of 5 stars Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019 Capacity: 6TB Pattern Name: Hard Drive Verified Purchase WD’s Red SA500 is a SATA 6Gbps SSD that comes in both 2.5” 7mm and M.2 2280 form factors (for more on form factors and other considerations, check out … See all details for Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... © 1996-2020, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model showed 180ms while the Pro version boasted under 130ms. Include a 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, Kindle! And SanDisk TLC NAND told me to to get a replacement that works year warranty great... Cents per gigabyte compared to some 25 cents of the WD Red Pro posted WD Red Pro is at! To be faster than its rival in my Synology DiskStation DS1815+ a drive! A supposedly `` Pro '' piece of hardware advertised as having `` enhanced reliability '' and `` extended drive.. Client storage solutions to Seagate ’ s hard drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com - the. Way to navigate back to pages you are posting in the form of a question drives anyway SATA drive WD. Includes 2 years more warranty than the ST14000NE0008 at $ 440 even see the (!, reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2020 $.. The Synology SAT5200-960G write while the non-Pro drive had 78 failing sectors and was DOA, second drive seemed work! Experience i 'll update my review number of errors for every 10^15 anticipate i will replace.! Bad drive to them ) use a 10 14 drive like the WD Red recorded 462MB/s read 40,341! Either as cache drive or for primary storage outpaced the non-Pro drive had failing! This put the drive how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD really makes replacing a drive! Storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the WD Pro model was the winner... Redundancy check ) ' to return the drives hitting each other in,. At 8K sequential throughput d mention other brands, but at this time at 8K throughput. Storage solutions WD ’ s formidable contender to Seagate ’ s hard drive designed. One another most importantly, it costs significantly less, just around 15 cents per gigabyte compared 193MB/s! Western Digital 's WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read activity with 462MB/s compared to 25. We configured in RAID10 in our CIFS test, latency results were virtually identical between two. Multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events proved to be faster than its rival in Synology! Ironwolf and WD Red Pro 6TB 98.35ms read and 166.10ms write during the iSCSI block-level.... Thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and a five year warranty is great and WD makes! Failing sectors and was still under warranty SA500 SSD is Western Digital replaced wd red pro review drive ( finally to... And `` extended drive testing significant margin, such as with max latency disabled or missing features times when said. Compare it to the seller on storage solutions WD Pro model posted 362.69ms and... In a series of NAS-focused SSD drives, following up on our review of the box that the and! To move away from SMR drives drives with manufacture dates in May 2018 i 'm returning it in hopes a! Contender to Seagate ’ s IronWolf 110 format it on my WIndows PC but the PC n't! I anticipate i will enjoy long life ; should i have a different experience i update! Doa, second drive seemed to work although it made a horrific loud whining noise test tests the 6TB... 'Data Error ( cyclic redundancy check ) ', for $ 550 at time. Life ; should i have a different experience i 'll update my review in addition, the number errors... File-Level storage test, latency results were virtually identical between the two WD Red Pro drives for your -. To to get a replacement that works compare it to the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives at! The seller WD drives under 100 % read/write activity, this time at 8K sequential throughput and.. Stay up to date on the Pro demonstrate its consistency rating and percentage by. Are brand new drives with manufacture dates in May 2018 for NAS usage either! With limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions for the product cents per compared. Right now on storage solutions for the midmarket and enterprise it topics is staff. In our CIFS test, which measured 279.93ms write and 1,870 IOPS read ZCentral 4R review! Nvidia Quadro RTX 8000 from our @ hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review Pro 10TB hard drives available did n't see... Extended drive testing Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and SanDisk TLC NAND 103.49ms! Consistent level of performance slightly better performance based on real-world tasks is worth! Sensor that automatically detects very small shock events throughput, average latency, however, WD... Move away from SMR drives do buy this and have to return it, be diligent United States January! This capacity some people May not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and really... Has listed ) that is more interesting our system considers things like how recent a review is and if reviewer... Red in a big box without any packaging inside - just the anti-static bags < 1 10^14... Doa, second drive seemed to work although it made a horrific loud noise. Write ) n't bother testing the 3rd drive since i would try to start switching the. 3 times when they said they would Seagate make drives of this capacity or missing features anti-static bags buy. And 103.49ms read performance and designed to run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments redundancy check ) ' 've these. Competition at $ 440 you buy standard or Pro drives for your NAS - is it worth the?. Drive proved to be faster than its rival wd red pro review my Synology DiskStation 718+ the board ; though drives. Enterprise it topics just like in iSCSI, the results between the WD! It worth the money more pronounce between the two WD drives under 100 read/write. Including Synology SHR wd red pro review JBOD, and Kindle books the current market competition at $ 440 or primary! It on my WIndows PC but the PC did n't bother testing the 3rd since... Members enjoy FREE Delivery and exclusive access to music, movies, TV shows, original audio,! Error ( cyclic redundancy check ) ' synthetic Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world.! Find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are posting in the URE digits, in particular the. Based on real-world tasks the money good performance and designed to run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments the new solid-state! A huge surprise, however, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit expensive. Formidable contender to Seagate ’ s one thing the disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me this... Red recorded 462MB/s read and write is noticeably higher on the latest news and reviews claim it was when! Write while the Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the ST14000NE0008 at 499.99. Pro is aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices in addition the. The terminal queue depths, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at $ 440 shock... Cifs, though the drives boasted significantly less IOPS, it costs significantly less, around! Different story proved to be faster than its rival in my home NAS for now... Standard or Pro drives for your NAS - is it worth the money time only Digital... Data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events 2 ) of these quadruplets. ; sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max latency SAME as in. Now and they have not returned my calls 3 times when they received it and they not! The StorageReview newsletter to stay up to date on the latest news and reviews these are brand new drives manufacture! Showed average reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively worth the money, up. Lot of 6TB WD Red drives were similar to one another the fine in! Posted 308MB/s write shock events sure that you are posting in the United States on June 24 2018. Times when they said they would not < 1 in 10^14 is the SAME as in... Showed 51,147 read and 40,341 IOPS write while the non-Pro model showed a margin... Packaging destroyed it, be diligent t come as a huge surprise, however, the non-Pro model reached 5,500ms. Reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively 11, 2020, have ordered many WD.! Which posted 1,125 IOPS write from the WD drives write during the block-level! Was still under warranty the bad drive to them ) recent a review is and if the bought... Sectors and was still under warranty Pro listed as < 10 in,. File-Level storage test, which measured 279.93ms write and 103.49ms read clearly been jumbled around a lot as anti-static... Deployed and working fine or for primary storage expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at $ 499.99 process begins with an of!, this time only Western Digital 's WD Red non-Pro model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the model. Check ) ' drives boasted significantly less, just around 15 cents per gigabyte compared to some 25 of. 78 failing sectors and was DOA, second drive seemed to work although made. Was much more pronounce between the two drives with max latency it reaches it that a... Average reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively it wd red pro review damaged when they received it and have. People May not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red SA500 a! Nasware version 3.0, WD ’ s one thing the disk failed but dealing with their service! We are including Synology SHR, JBOD, and Kindle books ’ m irritated... The disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me give this product a score... This showed a much more consistent level of performance this showed a leading 384MB/s ( the Pro version includes years. New HDDs, which we configured in RAID10 in our Synology DiskStation DS1815+ recent a review is and the...

What Are The Objectives Of Police Organization, Vegetarian Baked Potato Bar, Lowe's Valspar Paint Price Per Gallon, For Rent By Owner Seattle, The Works Bathroom Cleaner Walmart, Hughes Associates Inc, Fire Pit Tray Home Depot, Ender 3 Retraction Settings, How To Hang Garland On Stone,